PERFINK YOUR WAY TO HAPPINESS - A WEEKLY BLOG (To perfink means to perceive/feel/think).
 

If you want to be happy, then you have to learn how to think clearly.  If you think unhappy thoughts, you will get unhappy emotions as a consequence.  In the ancient world, Buddhism and Stoicism advocated mind control to reduce emotional suffering.  In the modern world, Albert Ellis pioneered this field of enquiry, followed by Aaron Tim Beck.  Dr Jim Byrne is now combining all of those systems of thought into a highly effective system of critical thinking to produce a self-coaching approach to emotional self-management.  This can also be seen as an effective system of emotional intelligence development.

~~~

SITE MAP

~~~

Archive Newer | Older

Friday, June 26, 2009

LIFE IS DIFFICULT - OR IS IT?
Hi,
Here we are again.  Another week has flown past, and not without incident.  Lots of difficulties and tribulations have come my way, and the way of my family.  And yet we chewed them up and digested them pretty well.

It's always somewhat difficult to know where to start with this blog.  I could emphasize positive thinking.  Think positively about your life, and only think about things positive.  Never entertain any negative thoughts.  That, by the way, was the message of Bob Proctor's email, this morning.  (Yes, we get one every single day!)

On the other hand, I could emphasize Albert Ellis' approach, of thinking 'realistically' or 'rationally', and not entertaining any irrational or exaggerated ideas.

Or I could just do nothing special - wu wei, in Zen speak.  But it's hard to know how to do wu wei in a blog. 

I had thought I would focus on the problem of breakdowns of communication between parents and their adolescent or adult children; the so-called generation gap - which is a source of pain and suffering for most parents at some point in their lives.  But I don't feel that would be appropriate today.

So instead, I will just say this:  We each have a huge capacity to be good, and to be evil.  Yes, me included; and Mother Theresa!

Society depends upon all of us developing our good side and restraining our bad side.  The bad side - or bad wolf - has been shown quite clearly recently in the banking scandals, and the MPs expenses scandals, and other tales of greed; and various wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan, for examples; or the situation in the Middle East (Palestine).

The rewards for loving are love.  You get to feel it and you get some of it back.  You get to 'feel the sun from both sides'.  Whether we are parents or children, and most of us are both, we owe it to the world to keep as positive about our family relationships as we can.  Sure we will get on each others itts from time to time.  But try to feel the love, and not the potential hatred, that we hold inside.  Try to grow the good wolf in yourself, even in the face of provocations, where members of your family are operating from bad wolf.  Perhaps in time they will outgrow their current phase or state, and rediscover you, and how much they love you.  How likely is that if you keep operating from angry wolf with them?  (Of course, if you are too passive, you may invite abuse!)

Make sure you protect yourself from harm.  Nobody is entitled to harm you, whether they are your parent or your child.  Protect yourself, and find other things to interest you while your family members are estranged from you, or otherwise not available to you as much as you would like.  As long as you operate from love, good things will happen to you, on average, and overall - not in every instance!

So stay in touch with your loving side; your tolerance; your patience; your acceptance of the rights of other people to come and go as they please.  None of us is a slave or servant of our parents or our children.

Be well, and keep loving.
Jim

Dr Jim Byrne
Doctor of Counselling.
ABC Coaching and Counselling Services

~~~

If you like the Friday Blog, then why not share it with your social networks.  Click the button that follows and choose your network(s). 


Bookmark and Share 

Fri, June 26, 2009 | link          Comments

Friday, June 19, 2009

A new window on the world!

Hi,
Here we are again.  Let me tell you a little story.  Once upon a time there were 4 little windows!  No, no, no, no, no!  Just kidding.  Let's take a break from the GD windows for a while.  Not that it's not a great model, but a change is as good as a rest.

When I checked my emails this morning, I found this from Bob Proctor:

"Years ago I heard a story of a dad named Paul who gave his young son a small chalkboard to practice writing on. One evening his son called out from the bedroom, "Dad, how do you spell best?"


"Paul answered him. Moments later, the boy hollered, "How do you spell kid?"


"Finally he asked, "How do you spell ever?"


"When the boy showed him what he'd written on the chalkboard, Paul expected to see 'I'm the best kid ever.' Instead, the boy beamed as Paul read the message: 'You're the best dad a kid can ever have.'


"Paul recalled that it was one of the best days of his life. In fact, he had to buy his son another chalkboard because he wanted to save this message forever and hang it on his wall. It's still there."

Perhaps Bob thought this message would inspire me, uplift me, and show what a great inspiration he is.  Unfortunately, I have more than one kid in my life who does not appreciate me.  And am I alone in that?  Not at all.  Most children judge their parents, and if the parents are lucky their kids might eventually get 'off it' and forgive the parents for being fallible and imperfect human beings.  But not before the age of 30, or 40, and often not until the cuffing funeral oration.

"My (dad/mum) was the best (dad/mum) I could ever have asked for.  What a pity I never got a chance to tell them!"

Duh!  Grow up!

Unlike Bob Proctor, Kalil Gibran knows a bit about being wise.  In his book, The Prophet, Gibran has the prophet tell his massed audience, when they asked him to speak about children, 'Our children are NOT our children.  They are an expression of life's longing for itself'.

In other words, our children come through us, but are not of us.  We (parents) are just like a long-bow that is stretched to launch an arrow (a child) into the world.  Our job is done when the arrow is safely launched.  The children are the future, and we are the past.  They learn from us, and benefit from our protection and care.  But they have to break from us, during adolescence, in order to form a sense of their own individuality - because that is how the western world is shaped: individualistically.  But they will always carry us in their heads.  And they are in truth made up of bits of us and bits of other people, and bits of their own experience of us and other people.

But they exist because nature wanted them to exist, and we were just pawns in nature's game - that is Gibran's message.

Back in the eighties, I went through a process called Erhard Seminar Training (EST) - as one of more than a dozen systems of inquiry that I explored.  EST seminars normally contained more than 60 participants and one trainer, with half a dozen assistants.  Among the participants, there were always more than a dozen who were hung up on their relationship with their parents.  They 'knew' that their cuffing parents should not have been the crummy way that they were, and only if the parents got off it, and learned to kiss the participant's ass, would the participant get off it and love them back.

The EST trainer's role was to persuade the participant that "You've got to complete your relationship with your parents; allow them to be the way they naturally are, completely; to let them know that, in their role as a parent they made it; they did that; they succeeded; you know!"

But why must we complete our relationship with our parents?  Because to not do so means we carry a civil war in our heads for all of our days, at great cost to our own inner harmony and sense of happiness and well being.  If we are not complete with our parents, we are not allowing a part of our own non-conscious mind to be the way it happens to be.  We are rejecting reality!  We have got to get off it with our parents so we can let go of them, and move on.  We have to give up on our hatred of our parents, for not parenting us according to our blueprint, our instructions and commands, and instead implementing their own crummy ideas with us.  We have to learn to love our parents, because our parents are part of us.

Our children are not our children, in that they came from nature because of a plan by nature.  But our parents ARE our parents, because in the process of protecting us for 15 to 20 years of our lives, they give us huge chunks of their minds, their souls, which we carry with us to the end of our wriggling, struggling, resisting, rebellious days in this vale of cuffing tears.

But let us here flush out the question of child abuse.  About 80% of all child abuse is probably carried out by about 20% of parents.  So only about 20% of children are 'on it' with their parents (or sipped off with their parents) because the parents were BAD - physically or sexually abusing them.

But we as (GOOD) parents had better expect, in about 80% of cases, that our children will not automatically, or easily, learn to accept our error-prone ways of being.  We are too imperfect for that!  And they (the children) are, of course, perfect in every way!

So what should we do?  Do not court love from your children.  That would be an abdication of our role as parents, as boundary setters, and standard setters, and so on.  So to hell with being appreciated.  If the choice is between being loved and approved by your kids, or doing your job as a parent, you have an over-riding moral responsibility to do your cuffing, thankless job!

But doesn't that doom you to a life of being hated by the kids for whom you gave up twenty years of your cuffing life?  Probably.  Or if not hated, then denigrated or ignored, or treated to an occasional condescending visit.  But that's life.  You do your job, and you accept the outcome.  The alternative is a nightmare scenario.  As you try to court approval and love from your child, you create a worse kind of monster: A moral imbecile who has no internal boundaries, and who learns to manipulate others by giving and withholding love as a weapon.

So grow up, take your medicine, and don't expect Bob Proctor to write a little ditty about how your kids thought you were brilliant.  This is not Hollywood!

Moving on: The next email down my list this morning was from a client who recently completed her counselling with me.  She wrote - unprompted - to say how much she appreciated the way I was with her.  That I was gentle, helpful, informative, and not at all possessive or controlling; not at all labelling of her because of her difficulties.

That was nice.  I was appreciated by somebody.  It is nice to be appreciated.  But I do not relate to my clients in a way that will produce that appreciation.  I am genuine in my encounters with them.  Sometimes what I say is easy for them to hear.  Sometimes it is difficult, or challenging.  But because they are not my kids, they can see me a lot more clearly than my kids can.  So they can tell me how much they got from me.

When I lie in my coffin, I expect there will be, all around me, kids, and other relatives, who 'never realized' how much I meant to them.  Who 'never got a chance' to tell me how much they appreciated me. 

But I already know how much I meant to them.  I don't need them to tell me.  I gave them a huge chunk of my life, of my love, of my time, of my devotion, of my dedication, of my moral guidance, of my compassion.  I don't need them to tell me how GOOD I WAS!

YOU TOO!  Think about it.  Do you really need anybody to tell you how good you were being to them?  Don't you already know in your heart how loving you are and were?

Grow up!

Love,

Jim

Dr Jim Byrne
ABC Coaching and Counselling Services

Email: Jim Byrne at ABC Coaching

PS: If this is the best Bob Proctor can do, he'd better go back to whatever he did before he took up coaching.

PPS: Next week: The Wind in the Windows!

PPPS: New content on this website includes: Courses on the Training Page; and Bits and bats on Dr Jim's Life Tips.

~~~

Fri, June 19, 2009 | link          Comments

Friday, June 12, 2009

The 'Mind Shed' Model...continued...
Hi,
I recently said that I thought my 'mind shed model', involving the four windows through which we can look to check on the nature of 'reality', was based on the Buddha Gautama's Four Noble Truths.  Soon afterwards, as I walked downstairs, I realized that was probably only partly correct.  So I looked it up in 'Practical Meditation with Buddhist Principles', (by Thubten Lhundrup, Victoria, Australia: Hinkler Books).

On page 12, Lhundrup lists the four noble truths as follows:

1. Suffering exists.

2. There is a cause of suffering.

3. Suffering can be stopped.

4. The path.

Truth No. 1 above clearly overlap my 'window' No.1:

* Life is suffering.

However, the next three are really quite different. My Windows 2-4 are as follows:

2. Life is without suffering provided we avoid picking and choosing.

3. Life is both difficult and non-difficult.  And:

4. Life is neither difficult nor non-difficult, as 'difficult' and 'non-difficult' are just sounds in the air; word-labels; concepts; and not "concrete realities".

 So where did I get the inspiration for Windows 2-4?  Then it returned to me.  I got those ideas from Alan Watts's 'The Way of Zen', (London: Penguin).

I recall that Watts presented them as different 'sutras', or 'wise texts'.  At the time - about 15 to 20 years ago - I did not register that they were pointing to a very helpful insight: That there are no absolutely true statements that can be made about human suffering, or anything else.  Human realities are always interpretative.  However, there can develop significant 'social agreements' to the effect that 'X is true' and 'Y is untrue'.  Those social constructions are very powerful.

But wait.  This is nominalism - everything is name only.  However, I no longer subscribe to that idea - which is also the basis of much (though perhaps not all) post-modern philosophy.  I am now a 'contextual constructionist'.  I believe that there is a 'noumenal reality' beyond our 'phenomenal constructions' about it.  So I believe I live in a real house, though ten people seeing my home would likely see it in many different ways, based on their backgrounds and experience.  However, despite their inability to agree on the nature of my home, it would remain true that my home is a real bricks-and-mortar building, with various forms of furnishings and decorations within it.

So back to my four windows:  Let's reevaluate them:

1. "Life is suffering".  Hardly all of the time!  Life is difficult much of the time, because of environmental stressors, and because of our finite internal resources for coping with those stressors.  Life is difficult when we try to cheat, or indulge in other vices; but life is often very sweet when we try to be grateful, compassionate, accepting, and so on.  When we indulge our virtues.

2. "Life is without difficulty, provided we avoid picking and choosing".  I think it was a British philosopher who once remarked that this kind of statement could not be made by anyone who had to spend one hour, in an underdressed condition, walking into a force ten gale, including rain and hail and freezing temperatures.  In other words, this view denies external reality, or assumes that external reality can always be subjugated to internal mental states.  However, for some people this is true.  So, for example, in ancient Japan, zen students thought so little of material reality and their 'own existence', that they would gladly disembowel themselves with a sword on the instruction of their 'master'.  However, I do not think most ordinary citizens of Europe or the Americas would care to develop such a high level of 'detachment'.  Therefore, we need to apply this principle flexibly.  Perhaps we can say: "Most ordinary frustrations and difficulties can be largely overcome if we are willing to give up choosing that they not exist".  Or as we say in REBT, we make our ordinary frustrations and difficulties worse by DEMANDING that they be different from the way they happen to be.

3. "Life is both difficult and non-difficult".  This seems much less problematical.  Even for somebody who experiences chronic pain, the pain comes in waves.  And in between the crests of the waves of pain, a blessed sense of relief is experienced.  The secret to pain relief is to accept the wave of pain as unavoidable, and to celebrate the moments of relief.  To go with the flow.  To give up trying to push the pain away.  Because, whatever we resist will surely persist!  And in most lives, there is rain and sunshine; pleasure and pain; frustrations and satisfactions.  Here an empowering philosophy can help.  For example, you cannot hold on to satisfaction.  It also comes in 'waves'.  So when it comes, we enjoy it.  And when it goes, we need to complete our awareness of its absence, and to thereby make room for its return.

4. "Life is neither difficult nor non-difficult".  This is not easy for ordinary individuals to grasp.  This is a warning to watch our languaging.  If we keep focusing on our interpretation of life as difficult, then guess what?  It will get more difficult, and thus satisfy our self-fulfilling prophesy.  If life seems difficult today, then know that that is a result of everything that was done yesterday, by you, your significant others, and the world at large.  If you want to have a better future, stop focusing on "difficult, difficult", and set some goals to get the things that would make the world show up as "non-difficult".  Bathe your mind in positive thoughts, images and emotions about a better tomorrow.  And then do whatever it takes to make that a reality!

Good luck.
And spend a little time in your 'Mind Shed'.  
Straighten out your crooked thinking!
Best wishes,
Jim

Dr Jim Byrne 
ABC Coaching and Counselling Services

Email: Jim Byrne at ABC Coaching

~~~ 
Fri, June 12, 2009 | link          Comments

Friday, June 5, 2009

THE FRIDAY BLOG: PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY
Hi,
Over the past couple of weeks I've been looking at ways of responding to adversity.  Ways of framing our experience so we cope better with life's difficulties.  So let's look at this some more.

Ask me how I am:

"How are you, Jim?"

That's not so easy to answer anymore.  A couple of weeks ago I would have done what most people do, which is to 'consult' their 'tacit', non-conscious knowing, and then to blurt out whatever 'comes up':

"I'm fine".  "I'm sipped off".  "I feel like tish".  And so on.

But now I am very much aware of the fact that I can conceptualize myself as sitting here in a small "hut", like a garden shed, with four windows that look out through the four walls of the shed.

If I look out through window No.1, I see that I have had a difficult week - my life is difficult.  So how am I?  I would be tempted, in this context, to say: 'I am feeling very frustrated by the ongoing struggle to recover the position of my website after the crash some weeks ago'.  (For example, I spent all week trying to rebuild and relaunch the Training Page, here).

However, I am now aware that if I look out through window No.2, I will see that my life is not difficult, provided I stop being selective about what 'should' come into my life, and what I 'should' be able to avoid.

And if I look out through the third window, I see that my week has had some good bits and some bad bits.

And if I look out through the fourth window, I see that all of these 'appraisals' are based on culturally relative linguistic conventions, and not on something called "objective reality".

So how am I?  It also depends upon whether I am wearing the 'Black Hat' or the 'Yellow Hat' in evaluating the difficulties of the week. (See last Friday's blog for a description of Dr Edward De Bono's 'Six Thinking Hats' model)  For those difficulties have had some good and some bad consequences.

And - to introduce a new dimension - doesn't it also depend upon which 'ego state' I am in.  (For an introduction to 'ego states', please click this link).  From Adult ego state, I would be operating like a computer, working out the pros and cons of the situation, and realizing that nothing seems ever to be wasted.  All struggles are grist to my mill of learning to overcome obstacles and difficulties, in order to achieve my goals.

But from Child ego state I might be whining about the injustice of it all: the unfairness!!!

And again, morally, I have a responsibility not to 'ontically dump' a pile of carp into your mind.  That is to say, it is too easy for me to respond to your enquiry by dumping all my problems into your lap, as if you were indifferent to my struggles, and then to walk away leaving you with the aftertaste of that dumping of my 'created reality'.

So how was my week?  It was a real mixture.  Nothing that I could not handle.  And I hope yours was at least that good; and I wish you a good one next week!

Take care - and watch which window(s) you are looking out through.  And watch which hats you are wearing.  And watch which ego state you are operating from.

And next time somebody asks how you are: why not stop and think? 

Why would I advocate stopping and thinking?  Well, when you take time to consciously think about your situation, you are effectively 'completing your experience' of what is going on in your life, which helps to process it so it can be 'filed away'.  When you fail to complete your experience of what is going on, it goes 'into the basement' of your mind in a non-file-able form, and rattles around causing you distress.

Best wishes,
Jim

Dr Jim Byrne
ABC Coaching and Counselling Services
Fri, June 5, 2009 | link          Comments


Archive Newer | Older

If you like the Friday Blog, then why not share it with your social networks.  Click the button that follows and choose your network(s). 

 

Bookmark and Share

"Effective thinking is thinking that not only clarifies problems and produces solutions, but also thinking that reduces emotional disturbances and promotes happiness".  Jim Byrne, August 2009